Compliance Requirements for Aesthetic Clinic Profiles and Submissions

Direct answer

A submission must identify the exact legal entity, branch, practitioners, claims, products/devices and evidence dates. AestheticClinic.my independently checks material fields; payment cannot create verification, alter an editorial conclusion or improve organic directory order.

AestheticClinic.my is an independent publisher, not a clinic, regulator or treating practitioner. The purpose of this guide is to make a public record easier to check and interpret. It does not diagnose a person, approve a provider, guarantee that a register is complete in real time or replace clarification from the competent authority.

Step-by-step verification method

1. 1. Identify the accountable entity

   Provide the legal or registered facility name, exact branch address, public contact and authorised submitter.

2. 2. Provide field-level evidence

   Each doctor, premises, product, device, advertisement and price statement needs its own source, identifier, scope and date.

3. 3. Separate claims by category

   Clinical effectiveness, official registration, price, practitioner scope and commercial offer are different claims and cannot share one generic proof file.

4. 4. Permit independent checking

   Submitted claims remain pending until the editorial team checks the appropriate official or primary source.

5. 5. Maintain changes and corrections

   Clinics should report material changes. The public record may be corrected, dated, suspended or removed when evidence expires or conflicts.

What the result means—and what it does not mean

• Verification is field-level and dated; it is not a provider award or comprehensive quality certification.
• Sponsorship, profile claim status and editorial verification are stored and displayed separately.
• Patient data, medical records or unnecessary identity documents must not be submitted through ordinary listing forms.

Verification states should therefore use narrow language such as “matched official record on 25 August 2026” rather than “approved,” “recommended” or “best.” If the official source is unavailable or ambiguous, the responsible state is pending clarification—not a negative accusation.

Evidence to retain

What to do when the record is unclear

First, recheck spelling, identifiers, branch and category. Preserve the exact query and result. Ask the provider for the missing identifier without accepting a marketing screenshot as final proof. If the issue remains material, use the contact or complaint route published by the competent authority. Do not post an allegation merely because a public search returned no obvious match.

When a health or safety problem is happening, verification is not the first priority. Seek appropriate medical assessment or emergency help, then preserve records and use the applicable regulator or professional body. Financial, facility, practitioner, product/device and advertising complaints may follow different routes.